16 Comments
User's avatar
Adrian Roberts's avatar

I must declare an interest: if I have grandchildren, the likelihood is they will be half Japanese. Given that we find it hard to deport even the vilest Bomalian criminals, my concerns are probably academic. Nonetheless, I would be interested to know why, if I’ve understood rightly, you take the view that mixed-race citizens should, in principle, be remigrated even if they are 50% native (this will be particularly fraught if other countries adopt the same policy).

Greg Johnson's avatar

Since the white race is dwindling in our homelands, we need to put policies in place to ensure that whites who do reproduce don’t do so with other races, further compounding our demographic decline.

Alice England's avatar

Excellent article thank you! I agree with every point you raised! Remigration must happen for us to have a future, for generations to come need this from us; it is our duty to push for remigration.

Dave's avatar

Take away all the non aryans

Scott's avatar

Civil War is Inevitable

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 28
Comment removed
Zorro McChuzzer's avatar

If these foreigners are such valuable Human Capital, they should be making their own countries better. I say this with no ill will, but we just want to live with OUR people. Anything else is simply torture, and a result of the ziobankster subversion of The West. We instinctively recognize this on a visceral level. Why do you think people react so strongly to old photos of 'The Before Times'?

Removing all nons from our countries will result in a huge sigh of relief, followed by raucous cheering and childbearing.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 31
Comment removed
Greg Johnson's avatar

Poles are perfectly nice people. But it would have been better for England to pay more for plumbing and strawberries to maintain their ethnic integrity.

Zorro McChuzzer's avatar

You don't get it. It's not about whether they are nice people or not. Everyone needs to stay home and sort themselves out. This is how true growth, happiness and innovation occur.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 31
Comment removed
Zorro McChuzzer's avatar

For every Freddie Mercury we get 6,000,000 Muhammad the Rapists on Welfare. Not worth it by any metric. They can all stay home, and Freddie can be Sri Lanka's brightest son.

I'm tired of people thinking they have a right to access my homeland. We're busy, we're full, and we're simply uninterested in the company of foreigners. No alleged 'economic benefit' will change this, by the way. People have woken up and seen that benefits only go to corporations. It's a lose-lose for the natives.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 31
Comment removed
The Anti-Gnostic's avatar

We are full. They compete for housing, education and other private goods or get slotted into yet another job that will shortly be automated away and they can stay home and make their own countries great again. Or, there are plenty of problems to solve in the Global South and they can go try and solve them there.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 31
Comment removed
The Anti-Gnostic's avatar

We don't need their labor. Farmwork is a scant 1% of U.S labor. We can send them home every summer and winter which is what we used to do, or just keeping inventing automated farm equipment. We've already run the experiment of importing a cheaper browner helot class to do work we considered beneath our teenagers. It's not ending well. By the way, houses were actually affordable before employers decided they needed one million immigrants a year. The immigrant rich economies of Canada and Britain have simply stopped growing.

Theoretically we could cherry pick from the nine percent of the global population with IQs exceeding 120 but the end result is to impoverish their homelands and make those countries our problem.

Lord Maximus's avatar

Worthy members of society…like those Indian CEO’s and business owners that then end up practicing extreme ethnic nepotism when it comes to hiring? Or perhaps an elite non-white that climbs to political office and then inevitably ends up advocating for more immigration which leads to further ethnic displacement? Many such cases.

Yes, economic depression is preferable to ethnic errasure. The former is infinitely easier to solve than the latter.

David Pringle's avatar

The US has been at least 25 percent of global GDP since 1889. The US was 40 percent of global GDP in 1960. Both with 5 percent of global population. We dont need any immigrants for 50 years at least.

Grandma's helper and Pacho the roofer are from, at best, mediocre countries with matching economic and racial performance. They are not an asset.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 31
Comment deleted
User's avatar
Comment removed
May 31
Comment removed
Greg Johnson's avatar

Replacing your own people with good quality migrants is still replacing one’s own people. That’s simply undesirable.

The ethnic integrity of a society should be one of the constants of a political regime, not a variable to be changed for economic reasons.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 31
Comment removed
Greg Johnson's avatar

IT work can be done anywhere. My webmaster lives in another country.