If the antiwhite forces gain enough power to oust Trump they will most certainly oust JD or at least quell him into compliant submission. This whole avenue of reasoning seems poorly structured.
Turning the Republicans toward anti-Trumpism would essentially hand it back to the Ted Cruz types.
We need our guys running seriously in primaries and we need to hang on long enough for more of the GOP's geriatrics to pass from old age. It's not fun, not clever, and not exciting, but it's the most plausible way forward. Please try to be more nuanced, the stakes are high.
Who said anything about "antiwhite forces" ousting Trump? You hallucinated that.
Trump would either be ousted by a majority of his cabinet under the 25 Amendment, or it would come through impeachment and conviction.
Who said anything about "Turning the Republicans toward anti-Trumpism"? The main reason to oust Trump is to keep the good things he has done.
Ted Cruz is not the Vice President. Vance is.
"Our guys" will have a much better chance once dozens of older Republicans have their political careers ended next month.
Trump is a liability. He is bringing on a blue wave. Not sure how "nuance" can avoid that conclusion, so let's think of what good might come out of it.
There aren't any pro-white politicians outside the few scraps we've gotten out of the MAGA wave. If Trump goes down, those guys will be hit hardest because they collectively will be blamed for electoral failures. That is why there isn't a pro-white GOP that can also oust Trump. It would effectively cannibalize the MAGA base (more than we're already seeing).
The establishment GOP is unconcerned with electoral losses because it boosts their fundraising. They are more than happy to watch the Brads vote democrat because it lets them return to business as usual, and will gladly roll into an amnesty deal as they've been continuously attempting for the last 2 years. I don't want to give them these things.
Trump's 2 big screw ups are Iran and Epstein, neither of which really matter much to me as a nationalist but we know that it's incredibly unpopular and you're right on that point. The Con Inc guys on the other hand are doing everything they can to avoid the SAVE Act (or any act at all really) to the point of literal dog and pony shows in the Capitol. They continuously fight the admin on immigration, visas, and all the domestic stuff that really damages the country in the long run. Both are demoralizing the nationalists and that's why we'rebickering all over the web right now.
My central criticism is that you're counting on Republican politicians to learn the right lesson from an electoral failure. You're a fair bit older than me so maybe you've seen things I haven't, but I've never known the GOP to use a loss as a reason to be more based.
If the antiwhite forces gain enough power to oust Trump they will most certainly oust JD or at least quell him into compliant submission. This whole avenue of reasoning seems poorly structured.
Turning the Republicans toward anti-Trumpism would essentially hand it back to the Ted Cruz types.
We need our guys running seriously in primaries and we need to hang on long enough for more of the GOP's geriatrics to pass from old age. It's not fun, not clever, and not exciting, but it's the most plausible way forward. Please try to be more nuanced, the stakes are high.
Jared has a much more level-headed read:
https://www.amren.com/videos/2026/10/is-the-gop-becoming-the-white-peoples-party/
Who said anything about "antiwhite forces" ousting Trump? You hallucinated that.
Trump would either be ousted by a majority of his cabinet under the 25 Amendment, or it would come through impeachment and conviction.
Who said anything about "Turning the Republicans toward anti-Trumpism"? The main reason to oust Trump is to keep the good things he has done.
Ted Cruz is not the Vice President. Vance is.
"Our guys" will have a much better chance once dozens of older Republicans have their political careers ended next month.
Trump is a liability. He is bringing on a blue wave. Not sure how "nuance" can avoid that conclusion, so let's think of what good might come out of it.
There aren't any pro-white politicians outside the few scraps we've gotten out of the MAGA wave. If Trump goes down, those guys will be hit hardest because they collectively will be blamed for electoral failures. That is why there isn't a pro-white GOP that can also oust Trump. It would effectively cannibalize the MAGA base (more than we're already seeing).
The establishment GOP is unconcerned with electoral losses because it boosts their fundraising. They are more than happy to watch the Brads vote democrat because it lets them return to business as usual, and will gladly roll into an amnesty deal as they've been continuously attempting for the last 2 years. I don't want to give them these things.
Trump's 2 big screw ups are Iran and Epstein, neither of which really matter much to me as a nationalist but we know that it's incredibly unpopular and you're right on that point. The Con Inc guys on the other hand are doing everything they can to avoid the SAVE Act (or any act at all really) to the point of literal dog and pony shows in the Capitol. They continuously fight the admin on immigration, visas, and all the domestic stuff that really damages the country in the long run. Both are demoralizing the nationalists and that's why we'rebickering all over the web right now.
My central criticism is that you're counting on Republican politicians to learn the right lesson from an electoral failure. You're a fair bit older than me so maybe you've seen things I haven't, but I've never known the GOP to use a loss as a reason to be more based.