Why the Truth about Epstein Doesn’t Matter
1,142 words
“Gentlemen, despite the heroic efforts of Michael Tracey, Richard Hanania, Patrick Casey, Nick Fuentes, and others among you, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor fell today, a victim of CHUD moralism. We must redouble our efforts to quash this moral panic. As you go forth, always remember that we are fighting for the most vulnerable. Politicians, bankers, and crowned heads are counting on you. Not one of the Q-tards we fight is ever troubled by the question, ‘What kind of world are we leaving for Goldman-Sachs?’ That’s what makes us better than them.”
—Some group chat somewhere on X
The phenomenon of Right-wing Epstein apologists and minimizers frankly baffles me.
Let’s begin with a thought experiment.
I hold in my hand a thumb drive containing information proving that the only people implicated in criminal activity by the Epstein files are Jeffrey Epstein and Gislaine Maxwell. Would I release this evidence to the world? After all, it would be a huge relief to the likes of Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Ehud Barak, Les Wexner, Noam Chomsky, Woody Allen, and other bigwigs, allowing them to carry on their good works untroubled by torch- and pitchfork-waving peasants whipped up into a moral panic by fervid online “conspiracy theorists.”
This is me, dropping the thumb drive into one of Epstein’s barrels of sulfuric acid.
Why?
I’m a dissident. I welcome anything that disrupts the current power structure. I welcome the delegitimization. I welcome the chaos. Every minute the establishment spends on damage control from the Epstein case is a minute not spent doing further harm to white people.
Beyond that, the Epstein case is a glimpse into how a hostile Jewish elite subverts and controls white elites through their vices. I’d welcome a chilling effect on that cozy relationship. I want ambitious whites to be afraid of being seen with people like Epstein, not clamoring for their favors. The next time Bill Ackman or Miriam Adelson or Paul Singer invites a political striver to dinner, I want him to wonder, “Will I be accused of eating babies for breakfast because of this someday?”
The Epstein drama is also a mini-“Day of the Pillow” for the upper levels of our gerontocracy. I welcome the redistribution of wealth and power to younger generations, who are often less deluded and corrupt.
Even if the Epstein files were entirely fictional, I would do nothing to suppress them, simply because, on balance, this crisis is good for White Nationalism. I’m not going to lie about Epstein. But neither would I lift a finger to exonerate him and his friends. If their whole world went up in flames, I’d just toast marshmallows.
My position on the Epstein files is analogous to my position on abortion. I think abortion is murder. The arguments offered for it are almost entirely specious. The people who advocate for it are almost entirely monstrous. But I will not lift a finger to stop it, because in the United States today, abortion works to delay the day when whites become a minority.
Beyond that, as David Zsutty has pointed out, there’s a whole lot of reason to think that crimes were committed by other people besides Epstein and Maxwell, and every reason to think that whatever kompromat they gathered was being shared with Israeli intelligence. It is perfectly reasonable for people to want to know more.
Why then are online dissidents staking their credibility—such as it is—on apologizing for, or minimizing, or deflecting for the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and associates?
The most innocent explanation is that they are trying to protect Donald Trump. Trump, after all, has orchestrated the whole coverup. They’re just being good MAGA soldiers. They’ve been convinced that only Trump can save America. They are convinced that releasing the Epstein files might impede that. Now that the files are out, they are trying to soften the blow.
I too want mass deportations and a secure border. I too want DEI to be rolled back. I will grant that Trump is doing good things. I want them to continue. But they will not continue unless the Republicans retain control of the Congress in the 2026 midterm elections and retake the White House in 2028. That looks increasingly unlikely, precisely because of Trump. Thus, sooner or later, the more MAGA Republicans are going to start thinking that, since Trump is blowing it anyway, it might be good for Trumpism and their own personal ambitions to have Trump step aside. At that point, the Epstein revelations will come in handy.
So even the best argument of the Epstein apologists doesn’t hold water.
What are some of their other motives?
I am sure that people like Patrick Casey, Richard Hanania, and Michael Tracey are auditioning for jobs as courtier journalists.
Nick Fuentes may simply be compromised.
Others might be reverting to their conservative priors. Conservative pundits love to LARP as guardians of the establishment, even though it is firmly in the hands of the Left. They have a horror of populism because it is lowbrow, conspiratorial, and seething with resentment. I, by contrast, think it is beautiful. I regard “Q-tards” as cannon fodder and thank them for their service.
Still others seem to regard the whole Epstein affair as merely a chance to differentiate their dissident infotainment brand from other dissident infotainment brands by quibbling about minutiae. It’s about market share.
Bitterness also plays a role.
Bitterness comes from suffering, especially suffering injustice, especially if one gets no help or sympathy. It can warp one’s soul. Bitterness is a form of neurosis, a chip on your shoulder that you carry forward with you. Because of bitterness, any reminder of the cause of your suffering will trigger pent up suffering and anger. In our movement, it is easy to be bitter against schizos, wignats, CHUDs, etc. Once they trigger you, it is tempting to defend the opposite of everything they say, just to get back at them. Yes, it sounds absurd. But so is the spectacle of Nazis white-knighting for Mossad agents like Epstein and Maxwell.
There’s also a great deal of bitterness against women. A significant segment of the online Right has a “Bros before hoes” attitude whenever men are accused of sexual crimes against women. In this case, their chosen “bro” happens to be Jeffrey Epstein. Yes, it is odd that they don’t sense how unseemly this is. This suggests that they are in the grip of neurotic embitterment.
By releasing the Epstein files, the American political establishment is behaving like Lord Denethor, dousing himself in oil and mounting his funeral pyre—and online Rightists are rushing to pour cold water on it. I hope that future historians will not record that the system’s enemies were less concerned with political victory than with scoring online points: triggering feminists, one-upping rival podcasters, and quibbling about the age of consent.
Source: https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/why-the-truth-about-epstein-doesnt-matter/
Thank you for your support of White Wellbeing.
As you know, the jewish World Congress has openly
declared war on the entire White Western race.
Their weapons are Migration Warfare and promoting
The Kalergi Plan of miscegenating the white race out
of existence.
Your right, the Epswine scandal is diverting attention
from Resident Rump's complete failure to deport
10 to 30 million military age Mudmen Migravaders and their
Baby Making Factory women.
Rump was selected by the Zionist Globalist Jew World Order
to pacify his MAGAtard supporters into keeping their 300 million
weapons silent. Thinking that the Rump will save them, they are
doing NOTHING.
Isn’t getting people to understand that the Epstein operation was an entirely Jewish affair despite some of the high profile gentiles who’ve been mentioned? Very few people see Jews as an enemy. They’ve yet to connect the dots and still believe the post WW2 narrative.
When the news cycle changes collective amnesia ensues. That’s also why it’s not assured that the House and Presidency will be lost.
Excellent points Greg!