6 Comments
User's avatar
Via Nova's avatar

For me, the possession of intelligence would mean a required subconscious that constantly interacts with the sublime. AI or ASI could never possess and make such connections. Their human creators, therefore, are like the mechanics of AI and ASI:

They (the creators) possess no intelligence because there's no required subconscious for a connection to the sublime.

Without a subconscious, the human person is cut off from such. He becomes a deracinated being. Deracinated human beings lack foresight (i.e. dangerous consequences).

These AI/ASI creators are the Deracinated Class. They are the ultimate nihilists. They are the late-stage modernists to nowhere. Although, I've never experienced a full historical cycle: dare I state that I now truly understand one?

Michael's avatar

This was the inevitable outcome of the enlightenment. We have excess people and many of them are genetic garbage now flooding into Europe. I welcome a purge by ASI.

Greg Johnson's avatar

From such an entity’s point of view, the differences between you and “excess people” is negligible. You’re assuming its preference would align with yours. If it doesn’t want what you want, there will be nothing you can do to change it.

Michael's avatar

Yes, I am assuming that the entity would have an interest in maintaining a small creative/productive human population. I think your instinct to treat the problem like nuclear proliferation is sound. But it is unlikely that any group, apart from cucked whites, would voluntarily agree to stop developing what they regard to be competitive edge. It may be a case of the only way out is through.

A White Light's avatar

If it's men like Yuval Harari, the transhumanist, globalist psychopath pushing this in the U.S. we could be doomed. Thank you for the clarity.

Rob Barber's avatar

>people who don’t know what arity is freaking out about propositional calculators again